Analytic Flying

Analytic Flying

In defence of the Passenger Movement Charge

And a call for much needed reform

May 19, 2026
∙ Paid

The Australian Federal Budget was read in parliament last week and the Passenger Movement Charge (PMC), ostensibly the international departure tax was increased from $70 to $80. The commentariat jumped on this decrying how it’ll now cost a family of four a total of $320 to leave the country. How outrageous?!?!

Image

While the headline in that article is provocative, the article itself is pretty good, highlighting the industry response. As expected, they criticised the move and we don’t blame them (see here, here). Global fuel prices are pushing up costs for airlines, leading to increased prices and demand destruction. The timing couldn’t come at a worse time for airlines.

Some of the framing has been absurd, for example some resorting to calling it a “big new cost”, despite the PMC having been around since at least 1978 (and probably earlier in some form or another). It was introduced at a rate of $10 in 1978, equivalent to $65 in 2025. While the PMC has increased quicker than inflation it’s hardly a “big” increase or “new”.

May be an image of text that says "Sydney SydneyAirport Airport port news .com.au BIG NEW COST FOR NYONE LEAVING AUSTRALIA"

Analytic Flying isn’t a political blog and we try to avoid politics at all cost. We have political views, but they aren’t interesting to our readers, so we leave them at the door. Today’s post isn’t about the politics of the PMC, but the economics of it. We’re here to talk policy, not politics!

To some extent we write in defence of the PMC, but also in criticism of its regressive and distortionary structure, arguing for much needed reform!

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2026 Analytic Flying · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture